One must work hard to prove one can bear it. Citizenship and the rights it grants are extremely valuable, and thus come with great responsibility.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST ESSAY EXAMPLES FULL
The society is prosperous, even though not everyone can enjoy the full scale of civic rights. In the world Heinlein describes, the population of Earth (or Terra, as it is named in the book) lives in a controlled democracy, a federation ruled by the military elite. A regular teenager from Buenos Aires, he decides to enter the ranks of the army in order to earn his right to vote and become a citizen. The book itself is written in the genre of military science fiction on behalf of the main character: Juan “Johnny” Rico. In fact, there were three screen versions, but the first one is the best, so for the sake of comparison, let us juxtapose the novel with just one movie. “Starship Troopers” did not have a literary sequel, but there were several movies released after the novel. On the contrary, it is one of those novels that serve as a mainframe, a roadmap to younger generations of authors who inherit the structure and the narrative of classics. Despite it having been written more than half a century ago, “Starship Troopers” still remains a book without age–meaning that it does not look obsolete. The original story was published in 1959, and a year later brought Heinlein the Hugo Award for Best Novel. There is, however, one novel that has become a true cult classic: “Starship Troopers,” a title that is probably familiar to everyone living in the West. Our new service will help you get it fast! Try it now Paulist Press.Can't find the answer 😢 to a tough question? Servant Leadership: a Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. “Army Profession and Leadership Policy.” Https://, /epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN3758_AR_600-100_FINAL_WEB_.pdf. Be, know, and do.įM 6-22 Leader Development – United States Army. In fact, both are subject to the Army’s Leadership Requirement’s Model. In conclusion, we can see that servant leadership and followership have minor differences but a lot of similarities. Whereas in followership, followers focus individual accountability and current tasks.
They focus on current tasks and future missions for the organization. Meaning they must maintain individual and team accountability. The main difference between servant leadership and followership lies in the tasks and level of accountability for each position. These are just but a few of the similarities. This displays competence to the rest of the team members and further strengthens the cohesiveness of the team. Confidence in their decisions and actions is a result of critical thinking. Furthermore, both positions need to employ critical thinking and confidence when going about their tasks. On the same token, effective followers need to trust and respect their leader’s guidance when tackling the organization’s missions. Trust comes from understanding team dynamics and building personal relationships with their subordinates. Servant leaders need to trust and respect their followers’ methods and will to accomplish tasks assigned to them. However, both terminologies have similarities.įor instance, trust and respect. In Greenleaf’s words, “The servant leader is servant first …” Alternatively, followership is the active pursuit of a leader’s goal for the organization by a follower.
It is a form of leadership where the leader places the needs and wellbeing of his/her subordinates first. The phrase ‘servant leadership’ is credited to Robert K. They exist separately but share plenty of attributes from the Army’s Leadership Requirements Model. Followership and servant leadership are like two sides of the same coin. In this essay, I will define, compare, and contrast followership and servant leadership.
0 kommentar(er)
